Inhaled Leukotriene E4, But Not Leukotriene D4, Increased Airway Inflammatory Cells in Subjects with Atopic Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allergen-induced late airway responses are associated with increased numbers of airway eosinophils and basophils. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effects of inhaled cysteinyl leukotrienes LTD(4) and LTE(4), which are released during allergen- induced airway responses, and allergen, on airway inflammatory cells. Fifteen subjects with atopic, mild asthma inhaled diluent, LTD(4), LTE(4), and allergen. Spirometry was performed for 7 h, and sputum inflammatory cells were measured before, 7 h, and 24 h after challenges. The maximum early percent fall in FEV(1) was 23.6 +/- 1.4%, 21.6 +/- 2.3%, 29.3 +/- 2.4%, and 4.0 +/- 1.1% after LTD(4), LTE(4), allergen, and diluent, respectively. Only inhaled LTE(4) and allergen significantly increased sputum eosinophils at 7 h and 24 h, and sputum basophils at 7 h. Six additional subjects underwent airway biopsies 4 h after inhalation. There were significantly more eosinophils in the lamina propria after inhalation of LTE(4) compared with LTD(4) and diluent (p < 0.05). These results suggest cysteinyl leukotrienes play a role in eosinophil migration into the airways in allergic asthma, and for the same degree of bronchoconstriction, inhaled LTE(4) causes more tissue and airway eosinophilia than LTD(4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".