Environmental controls on the carbon isotope composition of ecosystem-respired CO2 in contrasting forest ecosystems in Canada and the USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compared the carbon isotope composition of ecosystem-respired CO2 (delta13C(R)) from 11 forest ecosystems in Canada and the USA and examined differences among forest delta13C(R) responses to seasonal variations in environmental conditions from May to October 2004. Our experimental approach was based on the assumption that variation in delta13C(R) is a good proxy for short-term changes in photosynthetic discrimination and associated shifts in the integrated ecosystem-level intercellular to ambient CO2 ratio (c(i)/c(a)). We compared delta13C(R) responses for three functional groups: deciduous, boreal and coastal forests. The delta13C(R) values were well predicted for each group and the highest R2 values determined for the coastal, deciduous and boreal groups were 0.81, 0.80 and 0.56, respectively. Consistent with previous studies, the highest correlations between delta13C(R) and changes in environmental conditions were achieved when the environmental variables were averaged for 2, 3 or 4 days before delta13C(R) sample collection. The relationships between delta13C(R) and environmental conditions were consistent with leaf-level responses, and were most apparent within functional groups, providing support for our approach. However, there were differences among groups in the strength or significance, or both, of the relationships between delta13C(R) and some environmental factors. For example, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and soil temperature were significant determinants of variation in delta13C(R) in the boreal group, whereas photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) was not; however, in the coastal group, variation in delta13C(R) was strongly correlated with changes in PPF, and there was no significant relationship with VPD. At a single site, comparisons between our delta13C(R) measurements in 2004 and published values suggested the potential application of delta13C(R) measurements to assess year-to-year variation in ecosystem physiological responses to changing environmental conditions, but showed that, in such an analysis, all environmental factors influencing carbon isotope discrimination during photosynthetic gas exchange must be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".