Clostridium difficile Infection after Adult Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Study of Epidemiology and Risk Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We sought to describe the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among adult recipients of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) within the first year after HSCT in centers with variable epidemiology of hypertoxigenic strains. A multicenter, retrospective nested case-control study was conducted among 873 auto-HSCT recipients at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (HMR) between January 2003 and December 2008. Despite center differences in the prevalence of NAP-1 strains during the study period (21% to 43% at JHH versus 80% to 84% in HMR), the 1-year incidence of CDI was similar in the 2 hospitals (6.2% at JHH versus 5.7% at HMR). The median time to infection was 11 days (interquartile range, 1 to 27 days). In case-control analyses, grade ≥2 mucositis (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; P = .02) and receipt of a fourth-generation cephalosporin (OR, 2.76; P = .04) were identified as predictors for CDI. Mucositis was the strongest predictor of risk for CDI in multivariate analysis (adjusted OR, 2.77; P = .03). CDI is a common and early complication of auto-HSCT. Treatment-related gastrointestinal mucosal damage, along with the potentially modifiable risk of antimicrobial exposure, influence the risk for CDI early after auto-HSCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".