Induction of yeast cells from sporangiospores of Rhizopus stolonifer was inhibited by sodium fluoride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was aimed at determining the effect of the glycolytic inhibitor, sodium fluoride(NaF), on induced yeast cells. Rhizopus stolonifer was cultivated in synthetic broth for 120 h, at pH 4.5 and ambient temperature of 28 ± 1°C, using sporangiospores as inoculum.Growth was in discrete units, which were sedimented. Microscopic examination revealed induction of neoplasts, protoplasts and yeast cells, but biomass profiles (OD, 625nm) did not exhibit sigmoid pattern in control or glycolytic inhibitor-NaF incorporated broths. A two-way analysis of variance showed that NaF and its interaction with time significantly affected growth (p < 0.05). Means separation was into three subsets, with 20 mM (subset 1) having the highest biomass and least occurred at 5 mM, which was comparable to 30 mM, control and 10 mM (subset 3). A further study revealed effect of application time ofNaF at two levels (20 and 10 mM) on morphological expression. Three main effects were observed: (a) complete inhibition of yeast induction, (b) delayed induction of yeast cellsand (c) apoptosis of induced yeast cells. In the complete absence of yeast cells, protoplasts were copiously produced. However, when yeast cells were induced prior to NaF challenge, the inhibitor caused death of cells. Hence, it was suggested that induction of terminal budding yeast cells was closely associated with glycolysis. Further studies are recommended in order to examine the contribution of individual inductive enzymesincluding those of glycolysis, during the transformation process. Key words: Rhizopus stolonifer, sporangiospores, protoplasts, yeast induction, sodium fluoride, apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".