Intranasal CpG DNA therapy during allergen exposure in allergic rhinitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 1) To estimate the effectiveness of intranasal administration of CpG DNA alone on allergic rhinitis compared with intradermal administration; and 2) to find out how CpG DNA therapy is useful in treatment of allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: Mice were intraperitoneally sensitized and intranasally challenged with Japanese cedar. Therapy with CpG DNA alone was also performed during challenge, either intranasally or intradermally. Immunologic variables and nasal symptom were studied. RESULTS: Intranasal administration of CpG DNA alone significantly reduced the levels of IgE, IL-5 productions from nasal lymphocytes and splenocytes, nasal eosinophilia, and nasal symptoms, although intradermal administration of CpG DNA alone showed no significant reduction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that CpG DNA has effects not only on splenocytes but also on nasal lymphocytes to attenuate allergic rhinitis, and that intranasal administration, but not intradermal administration, of CpG DNA alone during allergen exposure is useful for control of allergic rhinitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".