Loss of Smad5 leads to the disassembly of the apical junctional complex and increased susceptibility to experimental colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The regulation of intestinal epithelial cell adhesion and migratory properties is often compromised in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite an increasing interest in bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) signaling in gut pathologies, little is known of the specific roles played by individual Smads in intestinal epithelial functions. In the present study, we generated a mouse model with deletion of Smad5 transcriptional effector of the Bmp signaling pathway exclusively in the intestinal epithelium. Proliferation, migration, and apical junctional complex (AJC) protein expression were analyzed by immunofluorescence and Western blot. Human intestinal biopsies from control and IBD patients were analyzed for SMAD5 gene transcript expression by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Smad5(ΔIEC) and control mice were subjected to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental colitis, and their clinical and histological symptoms were assessed. Loss of Smad5 led to intestinal epithelial hypermigration and deregulation of the expression of claudin-1 and claudin-2. E-cadherin was found to be equally expressed but displaced from the AJC to the cytoplasm in Smad5(ΔIEC) mice. Analysis of SMAD5 gene expression in human IBD patient samples revealed a significant downregulation of the gene transcript in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis samples. Smad5(ΔIEC) mice exposed to experimental DSS colitis were significantly more susceptible to the disease and had impaired wound healing during the recovery phase. Our results support that Smad5 is partly responsible for mediating Bmp signals in intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, deficiency in epithelial Smad5 leads to the deregulation of cell migration by disassembling the AJC with increasing susceptibility to experimental colitis and impairment in wound healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".