MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159307499 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/163

<i>NuSTAR</i>OBSERVATIONS OF MAGNETAR 1E 1841–045

2013· article· he· W2159307499 on OpenAlexaff
Hongjun An, Romain Hascoët, V. M. Kaspi, Andrei M. Beloborodov, François Dufour, E. V. Gotthelf, R. F. Archibald, Matteo Bachetti, Steven E. Boggs, Finn E. Christensen, William W. Craig, Brian W. Greffenstette, Charles J. Hailey, Fiona A. Harrison, Takao Kitaguchi, C. Kouveliotou, Kristin K. Madsen, C. B. Markwardt, Daniel Stern, Julia K. Vogel, William W. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetarAstrophysicsAstronomyNeutron star

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report new spectral and temporal observations of the magnetar 1E 1841-045 in the Kes 73 supernova remnant obtained with the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR). Combined with new Swift and archival XMM-Newton and Chandra observations, the phase-averaged spectrum is well characterized by a blackbody plus double power-law model, in agreement with previous, multi-mission X-ray results. However, we are unable to reproduce the spectral results reported using Suzaku observations. The pulsed fraction of the source is found to increase with photon energy. The measured rms pulsed fraction is ~12% and ~17% at ~20 keV and ~50 keV, respectively. We detect a new feature in the 24--35 keV band pulse profile that is uniquely double-peaked. This feature may be associated with a possible absorption or emission feature in the phase-resolved spectrum. We fit the X-ray data using the recently developed electron-positron outflow model of Beloborodov (2013) for the hard X-ray emission from magnetars. This produces a satisfactory fit allowing a constraint on the angle between the rotation and magnetic axes of the neutron star of ~20 degrees and on the angle between the rotation axis and line-of-sight of ~50 degrees. In this model, the soft X-ray component is inconsistent with a single blackbody; adding a second blackbody or a power-law component fits the data. The two-blackbody interpretation suggests a hot spot of temperature kT~0.9 keV occupying ~1% of the stellar surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207