Two epithelial cell invasion‐related loci of the oral pathogen <i>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two invasion-related loci, apiA and the two-gene operon apiBC, were isolated from the oral pathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans UT32. apiA encodes a 32.5 kDa protein that migrates on SDS-PAGE as a 101 kDa protein as detected by Western blot analysis or silver staining of an outer membrane-enriched fraction of Escherichia coli transformants. E. coli expressing ApiA have a different phenotype than the host vector, in broth and on solid media, and a colony morphology that resembles that of fresh A. actinomycetemcomitans isolates. These E. coli transformants bound to chicken collagen type II, human collagen type II, III, V and fibronectin. apiB and apiC encode proteins of 130.1 and 70.6 kDa, respectively. ApiBC conferred on E. coli a slightly enhanced ability to bind to collagen type III. ApiA- and ApiB-deficient mutants were constructed in A. actinomycetemcomitans. The ApiB-mutant had 4-fold diminished invasion of KB cells; the ApiA-mutant had increased invasion. Both loci were found in all A. actinomycetemcomitans strains, although polymorphism was detected only for apiBC. The deduced sequences of these invasion-related proteins are homologous to members of the YadA adhesin/invasin family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".