MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two epithelial cell invasion‐related loci of the oral pathogen <i>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</i>

2003· article· en· W2159311291 on OpenAlexaff
L. Li, Donco Matevski, M. Aspiras, Richard P. Ellen, Guylaine Lépine

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Microbiology and Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsActinobacillusBiologyOperonMutantMicrobiologyBacterial adhesinEscherichia coliPeriodontal pathogenPathogenWestern blotFibronectinMolecular biologyGenePorphyromonas gingivalisGeneticsCellBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two invasion-related loci, apiA and the two-gene operon apiBC, were isolated from the oral pathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans UT32. apiA encodes a 32.5 kDa protein that migrates on SDS-PAGE as a 101 kDa protein as detected by Western blot analysis or silver staining of an outer membrane-enriched fraction of Escherichia coli transformants. E. coli expressing ApiA have a different phenotype than the host vector, in broth and on solid media, and a colony morphology that resembles that of fresh A. actinomycetemcomitans isolates. These E. coli transformants bound to chicken collagen type II, human collagen type II, III, V and fibronectin. apiB and apiC encode proteins of 130.1 and 70.6 kDa, respectively. ApiBC conferred on E. coli a slightly enhanced ability to bind to collagen type III. ApiA- and ApiB-deficient mutants were constructed in A. actinomycetemcomitans. The ApiB-mutant had 4-fold diminished invasion of KB cells; the ApiA-mutant had increased invasion. Both loci were found in all A. actinomycetemcomitans strains, although polymorphism was detected only for apiBC. The deduced sequences of these invasion-related proteins are homologous to members of the YadA adhesin/invasin family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOral Microbiology and ImmunologySame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207