MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159420294 · doi:10.1083/jcb.200309081

Nesca, a novel adapter, translocates to the nuclear envelope and regulates neurotrophin-induced neurite outgrowth

2004· article· en· W2159420294 on OpenAlexaff
James I. MacDonald, Chris J. Kubu, Susan O. Meakin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Cell Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuriteBiologyCell biologySignal transducing adaptor proteinSignal transductionNuclear export signalNeurotrophinNerve growth factorNuclear localization sequenceCell nucleusCytoplasmBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide the first characterization of a novel signaling adapter, Nesca, in neurotrophic signal transduction. Nesca contains a RUN domain, a WW domain, a leucine zipper, a carboxyl-terminal SH3 domain, and several proline-rich regions. Nesca is highly expressed in the brain, is serine phosphorylated, and mobilizes from the cytoplasm to the nuclear membrane in response to neurotrophin, but not epidermal growth factor, stimulation in a MEK-dependent process. Overexpression studies in PC12 cells indicate that Nesca facilitates neurotrophin-dependent neurite outgrowth at nonsaturating doses of nerve growth factor (NGF). Similarly, short interfering RNA studies significantly reduce NGF-dependent neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. Mutational analyses demonstrate that the RUN domain is an important structural determinant for the nuclear translocation of Nesca and that the nuclear redistribution of Nesca is essential to its neurite outgrowth-promoting properties. Collectively, these works provide the first functional characterization of Nesca in the context of neurotrophin signaling and suggest that Nesca serves a novel, nuclear-dependent role in neurotrophin-dependent neurite outgrowth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Cell BiologySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207