MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159444272 · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.015545

Measuring alcohol consumption for genomic meta-analyses of alcohol intake: opportunities and challenges

2012· review· en· W2159444272 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arpana Agrawal, Neal D. Freedman, Yu‐Ching Cheng, Peng Lin, John R. Shaffer, Qi Sun, Kira C. Taylor, Brian L. Yaspan, John W. Cole, Marilyn C. Cornelis, Rebecca DeSensi, Annette L. Fitzpatrick, Gerardo Heiss, Jae H. Kang, Jeffrey O’Connell, Siiri Bennett, Ebony Bookman, Kathleen K. Bucholz, Neil E. Caporaso, Richard J. Crout, Danielle M. Dick, Howard J. Edenberg, Alison Goate, Victor Hesselbrock, Steven J. Kittner, John Kramer, John I. Nürnberger, Lu Qi, John P. Rice, Marc A. Schuckit, Rob M. van Dam, Eric Boerwinkle, Frank B. Hu, Steven M. Levy, Mary L. Marazita, Braxton D. Mitchell, Louis R. Pasquale, Laura J. Bierut

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Cancer InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyAlcohol consumptionEnvironmental healthGenetic associationAffect (linguistics)AlcoholAlcohol intakeConsumption (sociology)MedicineBiologyPsychologyGeneticsGeneGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.093
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.128
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0930.128
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.011
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.914
GPT teacher head0.591
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionSame topicAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsFrench-language works237,207