The biochemistry of Rubisco in Flaveria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C(4) plants have been reported to have Rubiscos with higher maximum carboxylation rates (kcat(CO(2))) and Michaelis-Menten constants (K(m)) for CO(2) (K(c)) than the enzyme from C(3) species, but variation in other kinetic parameters between the two photosynthetic pathways has not been extensively examined. The CO(2)/O(2) specificity (S(C/O)), kcat(CO(2)), K(c), and the K(m) for O(2) (K(o)) and RuBP (K(m-RuBP)), were measured at 25 degrees C, in Rubisco purified from 16 species of Flaveria (Asteraceae). Our analysis included two C(3) species of Flaveria, four C(4) species, and ten C(3)-C(4) or C(4)-like species, in addition to other C(4) (Zea mays and Amaranthus edulis) and C(3) (Spinacea oleracea and Chenopodium album) plants. The S(C/O) of the C(4) Flaveria species was about 77 mol mol(-1), which was approximately 5% lower than the corresponding value in the C(3) species. For Rubisco from the C(4) Flaverias kcat(CO(2)) and K(c) were 23% and 45% higher, respectively, than for Rubisco from the C(3) plants. Interestingly, it was found that the K(o) for Rubisco from the C(4) species F. bidentis and F. trinervia were similar to the C(3) Flaveria Rubiscos (approximately 650 microM) while the K(o) for Rubisco in the C(4) species F. kochiana, F. australasica, Z. mays, and A. edulis was reduced more than 2-fold. There were no pathway-related differences in K(m-RuBP). In the C(3)-C(4) species kcat(CO(2)) and K(c) were generally similar to the C(3) Rubiscos, but the K(o) values were more variable. The typical negative relationships were observed between S(C/O) and both kcat(CO(2)) and K(c), and a strongly positive relationship was observed between kcat(CO(2)) and Kc. However, the statistical significance of these relationships was influenced by the phylogenetic relatedness of the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".