Distribution of Insertion Sequences Associated with Tn <i>1546</i> -Like Elements among <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> Isolates from Patients in Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vanA gene cluster is carried as a part of Tn1546-like elements. The genetic diversity in Tn1546-like elements has been documented previously. The differences described thus far have included the integration of insertion sequence (IS) elements IS1216V, IS1251, IS1476, and IS1542. Among these, IS1216V has been reported to be widespread in VanA enterococci of diverse geographic areas, whereas IS1542 and IS1476 have been reported only in the United Kingdom and Canada, respectively. We investigated the distribution of ISs among 20 vanA-containing Enterococcus faecium isolates from human patients in nine different university hospitals in Korea. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to identify the clonality of the isolates. Moreover, PCR amplification of the internal regions of Tn1546 was performed for structural analysis of the van gene, and both DNA strands of the PCR amplicons were directly sequenced by the dideoxy termination method. The PFGE patterns revealed a high degree of clonal diversity. Structural analyses of the van gene detected IS1542 and IS1216V in the genomes of all 20 isolates, whereas it did not detect IS1476 or IS1251 in the genomes of any of the isolates. In addition, IS19 was detected in the vanS-vanH intergenic region of one isolate. These data indicate that identification of the IS within a vanA gene cluster could be a useful tool in epidemiological investigations. In addition, the distribution of ISs associated with Tn1546-like elements among the Korean isolates is therefore similar to that among European vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".