MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159609023 · doi:10.3141/1886-08

Traveler Information Provision for Incident Management: Implications for Vehicle Emissions

2004· article· en· W2159609023 on OpenAlexaff
Isam Kaysi, Chadi Chazbek, M. El‐Fadel

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Texas at AustinCalifornia Air Resources Board
KeywordsSoftware deploymentTransport engineeringWork (physics)Greenhouse gasBlueprintTraffic congestionIntelligent transportation systemTraffic simulationEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMicrosimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) in alleviating nonrecurring traffic congestion was assessed, and then the resulting implications for vehicle-induced emissions in a congested city in a developing country were estimated. This work provides a blueprint for future studies on both the evaluation of ITS deployment through dynamic traffic modeling and the assessment of resulting changes in travel times and emissions. The Greater Beirut, Lebanon, area road network was used as the test bed for evaluating strategies for incident management, which was the selected ITS application for this study. A series of simulation scenarios was conducted with dynamic traffic-simulation-assignment methodology, and resulting emissions were estimated with an emission-factor model. These scenarios were used to evaluate the effect of different ITS deployment parameters—such as type of information provision (pretrip and in-vehicle) and driver compliance—on network performance and resulting emissions. Network performance measures such as travel and stop times were developed, and corresponding vehicle emissions were estimated with carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and total organic carbon as indicators for each scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207