MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159786981 · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi117

Effects of dietary folate on the development and progression of mammary tumors in rats †

2005· article· en· W2159786981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research and Materiel CommandCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMammary glandInternal medicineEndocrinologyFolic acidCancerBiologyPhysiologyMedicineBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidemiologic studies have suggested that dietary intake and blood levels of folate may be inversely related to the risk of breast cancer. However, epidemiologic evidence has not been consistent nor has it provided unequivocal support for this purported inverse relationship. Recent evidence has also raised a concern that folate supplementation may promote carcinogenesis if provided after neoplastic foci are established in the target organ. This study investigated the effect of dietary folate deficiency and supplementation on the development and progression of mammary tumors in the N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) rat model. Weanling, female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed diets containing 0, 2 (control) or 8 mg folic acid/kg diet during the initiation or the promotion phase of MNU-induced mammary tumorigenesis. At necropsy, all macroscopic mammary tumors were identified and histologically confirmed. Dietary folate deficiency and supplementation provided during the initiation phase did not significantly modulate the development of mammary tumors. In contrast, dietary folate deficiency provided during the promotion phase significantly inhibited the rate of appearance, incidence, mean volume and weight of adenocarcinomas compared with the control and supplemental diets. Folate supplementation provided during the promotion phase did not significantly modulate mammary tumorigenesis compared with the control group. These data indicate that moderate folate deficiency inhibits, whereas dietary folate supplementation at four times the basal dietary requirement does not promote, the progression of MNU-induced mammary neoplastic foci in this rat model. However, the limitations associated with the route and dose of MNU administration preclude a definitive conclusion concerning the effect of folate status on the initiation of MNU-induced mammary tumorigenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it