MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159796823 · doi:10.1109/cca.2000.897437

Heading-aided odometry and range-data integration for positioning of autonomous mining vehicles

2002· article· en· W2159796823 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Nsasi Bakambu, Vladimir Polotski, Paul R. Cohen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometryInclinometerHeading (navigation)Global Positioning SystemKalman filterComputer visionComputer scienceVisual odometryArtificial intelligenceGyroscopeEngineeringMobile robotRobotGeodesyAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An enhanced odometry technique based on the heading sensor called "clino-gyro" that fuses the data from a fiber optic gyro and a simple inclinometer is proposed. In the proposed scheme, inclinometer data are used to compensate for the gyro drift due to roll/pitch perturbation of the vehicle while moving on the rough terrain. Providing independent information about the rotation (yaw) of the vehicle, clino-gyro is used to correct differential odometry adversely affected by the wheel slippage. Position estimation using this technique can be improved significantly, however for the long term applications it still suffers from the drifts of the gyro and translational components of wheel skidding. Fusing this enhanced odometry with the data from environmental sensors (sonars, laser range finder) through Kalman filter-type procedure a reliable positioning can be obtained. This technique has been implemented on-board of an experimental skid-steered vehicle. Obtained precision is sufficient for navigation in underground mining drifts. For open-pit mining applications further improvements can be obtained by fusing proposed localization algorithm with GPS data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207