MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159805184 · doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen299

Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis

2008· article· en· W2159805184 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Lafitte, M. Perlant, Patricia Réant, Karim Serri, H Douard, Anthony N. DeMaria, R Roudaut

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Echocardiography · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticCardiologyInternal medicineStenosisDoppler echocardiographyTreadmillEjection fractionBasal (medicine)Heart rateHeart failureBlood pressureDiastole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: As assessed by tissue Doppler velocities, longitudinal contraction is commonly altered at an earlier stage than radial contraction in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, its relationship to exercise tolerance or to prognosis has not been clearly established. By using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic strain, we sought to evaluate values of deformation components in the setting of severe AS and to correlate these values with exercise tolerance and with patients' outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five asymptomatic patients with severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) were studied by echocardiography and exercise treadmill and were compared with controls. Conventional echographic parameters as well as longitudinal, radial, and circumferential deformations by 2D strain were measured at rest. During exercise treadmill, maximum tolerated workload, maximum heart rate, blood pressure, and EKG ST variations were recorded. Patients were then followed during 12 months. Compared with controls, despite similar ejection fractions, AS patients presented with a significantly lower global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-17.8 +/- 3.5 vs. -21.1 +/- 1.8%, P < 0.05) more pronounced in the basal segments (BLS) (-12.4 +/- 2.9 vs. -18.4 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.05). No difference was observed in terms of radial or circumferential strains. In a subgroup of AS patients with abnormal response to exercise, GLS and BLS were significantly lower (-14.7 +/- 5.1 vs. -19.3 +/- 4.0% and -10.7 +/- 2.5 vs. -14.4 +/- 2.1%, P < 0.05). With cut-offs of -18 and -13%, GLS and BLS were able to determine an inadequate exercise response with a sensitivity and specificity of 68 and 75% (AUC 0.77), and 77 and 83% (AUC 0.81), respectively. Finally, patients with a basal strain below -13% presented with more cardiac events in the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients with severe AS, impaired longitudinal contraction assessed by 2D strain is associated with abnormal exercise response and with an increased risk of cardiac events during follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations200
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of EchocardiographySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207