MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159812536 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308181101

Regulation of ultraviolet light-induced gene expression by gene size

2004· article· en· W2159812536 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce C. McKay, Lawton J. Stubbert, Casey C. Fowler, Jennifer M. Smith, Robin A. Cardamore, Jennifer C. Spronck

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer FoundationUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsGeneDNA damageBiologyGene expressionTranscription (linguistics)Molecular biologyTherapeutic gene modulationUltraviolet lightIntronRegulation of gene expressionDNAGeneticsCell biologyRegulator geneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UV light induces the expression of a wide variety of genes. At present, it is unclear how cells sense the extent of DNA damage and alter the expression of UV-induced genes appropriately. UV light induces DNA damage that blocks transcription, and the probability that a gene sustains transcription-blocking DNA damage is proportional to locus size and dose of UV light. Using colon carcinoma cells that express a temperature-sensitive variant of p53 and undergo p53-dependent apoptosis after UV irradiation, we found that the number of p53-induced genes identified by oligonucleotide microarray analysis decreased in a UV dose-dependent manner. This was associated with a statistically significant shift in the spectrum of p53-induced genes toward compact genes with fewer and smaller introns. Genes encoding proapoptotic proteins involved in the initiation of the mitochondrial apoptotic cascade were prominent among the compact p53 target genes, whereas genes encoding negative regulators of p53 and the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway were significantly larger. We propose that the shift in spectrum of UV-responsive gene expression caused by passive effects of UV lesions on transcription acts as a molecular dosimeter, ensuring the elimination of cells sustaining irreparable transcription-blocking DNA damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207