FARADAY ROTATION OF THE SUPERNOVA REMNANT G296.5+10.0: EVIDENCE FOR A MAGNETIZED PROGENITOR WIND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present spectropolarimetric radio images of the supernova remnant (SNR) G296.5+10.0 at frequencies near 1.4 GHz, observed with the Australia Telescope Compact Array. By applying rotation measure (RM) synthesis to the data, a pixel-by-pixel map of Faraday rotation has been produced for the entire remnant. We find G296.5+10.0 to have a highly ordered RM structure, with mainly positive RMs (mean RM of +28 rad m −2 ) on the eastern side and negative RMs (mean RM of −14 rad m −2 ) on the western side, indicating a magnetic field which is directed away from us on one side and toward us on the other. We consider several possible mechanisms for creating the observed RM pattern. Neither Faraday rotation in foreground interstellar gas nor in a homogeneous ambient medium swept up by the SNR shell can easily explain the magnitude and sign of the observed RM pattern. Instead, we propose that the observed RMs are the imprint of an azimuthal magnetic field in the stellar wind of the progenitor star. Specifically, we calculate that a swept-up magnetized wind from a red supergiant can produce RMs of the observed magnitude, while the azimuthal pattern of the magnetic field at large distances from the star naturally produces the anti-symmetric RM pattern observed. Expansion into such a wind can possibly also account for the striking bilateral symmetry of the SNR's radio and X-ray morphologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".