MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159956768 · doi:10.1021/bi0497300

T7 RNA Polymerase Mediates Fast Promoter-Independent Extension of Unstable Nucleic Acid Complexes

2004· article· en· W2159956768 on OpenAlexaff
Hani Zaher, Peter J. Unrau

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase pairNucleotidePolymeraseRNATranscription (linguistics)Molecular biologyOligonucleotideDNABiologyNucleic acidT7 RNA polymeraseRNA polymeraseBiochemistryChemistryGeneBacteriophage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T7 RNA polymerase is a processive, DNA-dependent RNA polymerase that has a high specificity for its 17 base pair (bp) promoter. In addition to normal transcription, the enzyme can produce anomalous transcripts in the absence of a promoter. We report here the systematic characterization of the transient aspects of this promoter-independent process. Oligonucleotides that are able to form transient unimolecular loop structures closed by as little as one Watson-Crick base pair between the 3' terminal residue and an internal nucleotide proved to be viable substrates. A single nucleotide triphosphate assay system found that incorporation was encoded by the nucleotide 5' to the predicted transient base pair. When this coding nucleotide was identical to the internal nucleotide participating in the transient base pair, multiple nucleotide incorporations were observed and could only be explained by a continuous shifting and resetting of the transient base-pairing required for extension. This intermittent extension process can be quite efficient. Short DNA or RNA substrates were good substrates for the enzyme (affinities ranged from 2 to 43 microM) and were extended rapidly with apparent catalytic rates of up to 240 min(-1) being observed, only 2-fold slower than the rate of transcriptional initiation. Our data suggest a possible mechanism for this promoter-independent extension activity and may add to the understanding of viral RNA replicative strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207