MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159999483 · doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00115

Bone Fracture Incidence in End-of-Lay High-Producing, Noncommercial Laying Hens Identified Using Radiographs

2008· article· en· W2159999483 on OpenAlexaff
W. D. Clark, William R. Cox, F.G. Silversides

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsMinistry of AgricultureGovernment of British ColumbiaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)RadiographyMedicineDentistryVeterinary medicineAnimal scienceBiologyAnatomySurgeryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone fractures in laying hens are both a welfare and an economic concern for the poultry industry. The aim of this study was to use radiographs to quantify fracture incidence in 6 lines of noncommercial high-producing laying hens. A total of 451 hens (n = 71 to 78) were killed at 47 wk (White Leghorn-Black, White Leghorn-Blue) or 65 wk of age [Barred Plymouth Rock (BR), White Leghorn-Burgundy (WL-BUR), Columbian Plymouth Rock, Rhode Island Red (RIR)]. Radiographs were obtained with hens in 2 positions (lateral and ventrodorsal) and were used to identify fractures in the skeleton. Data on scallop-shaped indentations (possibly fractures) of the keel bone were also collected. After radiography, the left wings were removed for analysis of humeri, radii, and ulnae. Data for the 2 age groups were analyzed separately. The overall incidence of hens with at least 1 fracture was 6.6 and 15.7% in the 47- and 65-wk-old hens, respectively. Fracture incidence in 47-wk-old hens was not different between White Leghorn-Black and White Leghorn-Blue lines. Significant line differences were observed in the 65-wk-old hens, with at least 1 fracture found in 29.5% of RIR hens versus 9.5 and 4.2% observed in Columbian Plymouth Rock and WL-BUR lines, respectively. Fracture incidence in BR hens (18.2%) was greater than in WL-BUR hens. Fractures in RIR hens occurred predominantly in the furculum and wing bones, whereas pubic bones were most affected in BR hens. The proportion of hens with scallop-shaped indentations of the keel ranged from 36.1 to 88.2% and differed between lines in both age groups. High egg production did not seem to be associated with bone fragility in these lines. Two of the older lines (RIR and WL-BUR) had similar egg production, number of eggs to 60 wk, and egg shell weights at 4 ages but had a significantly different fracture incidence. The line differences in fracture incidence may have been affected by calcium metabolism, bone structure, and body weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207