MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160011290 · doi:10.1162/thld_a_00156

A Science of Signals: Einstein, Inertia, and the Postal System

2011· article· en· W2160011290 on OpenAlexaff
Jimena Canales

Bibliographic record

VenueThresholds · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopular scienceHistory of scienceArchitectureArt historyEinsteinHistoryMedia studiesLibrary scienceComputer scienceSociologyPsychologyPhysicsArchaeologyMathematics educationAstronomyScience education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

November 01 2018 A Science of Signals: Einstein, Inertia, and the Postal System Jimena Canales Jimena Canales Jimena Canales is Associate Professor in the Department of the History of Science at Harvard University, specializing in the history of physics and astronomy and contemporary cultural theory. She is the author of A Tenth of a Second: A History (Chicago University Press, 2010) and numerous articles on the history of science, architecture, film and visual technologies. Recent publications include “A Number of Scenes in a Badly Cut Film: Observation in the Age of Strobe,” in Histories of Scientific Observation (2011) and “Movement before Cinematography: The High-Speed Qualities of Sentiment,” in the Journal of Visual Culture 5 (2006). Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jimena Canales Jimena Canales is Associate Professor in the Department of the History of Science at Harvard University, specializing in the history of physics and astronomy and contemporary cultural theory. She is the author of A Tenth of a Second: A History (Chicago University Press, 2010) and numerous articles on the history of science, architecture, film and visual technologies. Recent publications include “A Number of Scenes in a Badly Cut Film: Observation in the Age of Strobe,” in Histories of Scientific Observation (2011) and “Movement before Cinematography: The High-Speed Qualities of Sentiment,” in the Journal of Visual Culture 5 (2006). Online Issn: 2572-7338 Print Issn: 1091-711X © 2011 Jimena Canales2011Jimena Canales Thresholds (2011) (39): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00156 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Jimena Canales; A Science of Signals: Einstein, Inertia, and the Postal System. Thresholds 2011; (39): 12–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00156 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThresholds Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2011 Jimena Canales2011Jimena Canales Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0140.014
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThresholdsSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207