MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160060558 · doi:10.1139/z08-110

Tracing salmon nutrients in riparian food webs: isotopic evidence in a ground-foraging passerine

2008· article· en· W2160060558 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Katie S. Christie, Morgan D. Hocking, T. E. Reimchen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsForagingFeatherBiologyPasserineTroglodytesEcologyOncorhynchusRange (aeronautics)Fish migrationNutrientPredationInvertebrateδ15NZoologyFisheryδ13CStable isotope ratioHabitatFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The predictable annual spawning of anadromous salmon (genus Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861) provides an important marine resource subsidy to terrestrial species throughout the North Pacific. Using isotopic ratios of nitrogen (δ 15 N) and carbon (δ 13 C), we examine pathways of salmon nutrient uptake by a ground-foraging passerine, the winter wren ( Troglodytes troglodytes (L., 1758)), captured above and below waterfall barriers to salmon migration from two rivers on the central coast of British Columbia. Wren feathers exhibited substantial variation in δ 15 N (range = 18.6‰) and δ 13 C (range =7.9‰), approximating the isotopic range of invertebrates sampled at our study sites. Mean δ 15 N values of feathers and feces representing the fall diet of winter wrens were enriched by 4.8‰ and 8.0‰, respectively, below versus above the waterfall barriers. We observed positive relationships between δ 15 N and δ 13 C in fall-grown feathers and fecal samples below the falls but not above the falls, and large positive shifts (as high as 14.3‰) in 15 N from summer to fall within individual birds. The large isotopic variation observed in this system likely can be explained by the mobility of wrens, isotopic variation in their prey, and individual variation in the consumption of fly larvae from salmon carcasses. Our results identify both direct and indirect pathways by which salmon-derived nutrients are cycled into top-level consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207