Additive effect of multiple pharmacological chaperones on maturation of CFTR processing mutants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most common cause of CF (cystic fibrosis) is the deletion of Phe(508) (DeltaF508) in the CFTR [CF TM (transmembrane) conductance regulator] chloride channel. One major problem with DeltaF508 CFTR is that the protein is defective in folding so that little mature protein is delivered to the cell surface. Expression of DeltaF508 CFTR in the presence of small molecules known as correctors or pharmacological chaperones can increase the level of mature protein. Unfortunately, the efficiency of corrector-induced maturation of DeltaF508 CFTR is probably too low to have therapeutic value and approaches are needed to increase maturation efficiency. We postulated that expression of DeltaF508 CFTR in the presence of multiple correctors that bound to different sites may have an additive effect on maturation. In support of this mechanism, we found that expression of P-glycoprotein (CFTR's sister protein) processing mutants in the presence of two compounds that bind to different sites (rhodamine B and Hoechst 33342) had an additive effect on maturation. Therefore we tested whether expression of DeltaF508 CFTR in the presence of combinations of three different classes of corrector molecules would increase its maturation efficiency. It was found that the combination of the quinazoline VRT-325 together with the thiazole corr-2b or bisaminomethylbithiazole corr-4a doubled the steady-state maturation efficiency of DeltaF508 CFTR (approx. 40% of total CFTR was mature protein) compared with expression in the presence of a single compound. The additive effect of the correctors on DeltaF508 CFTR maturation suggests that they directly interact at different sites of the protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".