Changes in family functioning for cancer patients undergoing surgery for the first time and their spouses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the present study, involving patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia for the first time and their families, was to examine changes in family functioning during the period before surgery and one month after it. Cancer patients who had never received surgical treatment and their families underwent the FFFS (Feetham Family Functioning Survey) Japanese version I. For both patients and their spouses, the level of importance of family functioning before the patients underwent surgery was higher, compared to after they received treatment. One month after surgery, the importance level of family functioning associated with “the relationship between the family and subsystems” for patients was significantly lower, and the importance level associated with “the relationships between the family and each family member” for spouses was significantly lower. This was because patients undergoing cancer surgery for the first time placed more importance on the relationship with medical professionals (as a subsystem), rather than family members. To cope with the crisis situation - patients undergoing their first surgery for cancer, their spouses desired to help each other with patients and other family members. When a cancer patient receives surgical treatment for the first time, it is important for health care professionals to establish appropriate relationships with them. Health professionals, nurses in particular, are also required to take time to provide intervention, including a proper explanation of treatment and support. It is necessary for medical professionals to help patients’ spouses accept the crisis situation - their families undergoing cancer surgery for the first time, confirm their roles, and support the patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".