Ground/Wall Effects on a Tilting Ducted Fan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mini-vertical take-off and landing aircraft have a wide range of potential applications in urban areas. In flights in confined spaces, however, the aerodynamics of the lifting devices (e.g., tilted ducted fans) change which significantly affects the flight performance. Therefore, for a successful flight, a model is required to provide the control system with the environmental effects on the lifting devices in real time. This paper presents the study performed on a tilted ducted fan to characterize ground/wall effects and develop a practical model for online flight control. For this, computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed in Fluent, for a ducted fan at different distances from ground/wall and with different tilt angles. The incompressible Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equations, with the standard k-ε model and the non-equilibrium wall function, were solved. To reduce the complexity of meshing, the fan was represented by Virtual Blade Model (VBM). A comprehensive study was performed to show that, by using the method of images and representing the fan as a single potential dipole, the fan performance can be predicted accurately on a practical range of operation. The developed potential flow model highly reduces the computational requirements and is practical to use for online semi-autonomous or autonomous navigation of ducted fan aerial vehicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".