MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Predialysis Care on Clinical Outcomes

2003· article· en· W2160263594 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hock H. Yeoh, Herbert S. Tiquia, Antoine Abcar, Scott Rasgon, Mohamed L. Idroos, Sam Daneshvari

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisReferralHemodialysisKidney diseaseEnd stage renal diseaseDiseaseMedical recordEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: A structured predialysis multidisciplinary team program is beneficial in improving quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Educating pre-ESRD patients about their disease is vital in their care. Patients who can identify signs and symptoms of impending problems can seek help and avoid complications that may lead to hospital admissions. Our dialysis center offers two predialysis classes in a structured format. The first class is for those patients with mild to moderate renal disease, whereas the second class is for those with advanced renal disease who are expected to need dialysis in 3 to 6 months. The patients are followed by a multidisciplinary team once they are enrolled in our chronic kidney disease program. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the charts of patients who started dialysis at our center between 1997 and 2000. We identified 68 patients who participated in the predialysis education program and 35 patients who did not because of late referral or refusal to participate. We compared these two groups over a 100-day period (10 days before initial dialysis and 90 days after), for hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and dialysis access placement. Patients' comorbid conditions, complications, and length of hospitalizations were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS: The 68 patients who completed the predialysis program had an average age of 60.3 years, a total of 96 hospital days, and 39 ER visits. Average length of hospital stay for these patients was 1.4 days. Three patients (4.4%) required placement of temporary catheters for the initial dialysis. Fifty-one percent of these patients had diabetes mellitus. The 35 patients of average age of 54.9 years who did not go through the program had 347 total hospital days and 39 ER visits. Average length of hospitalization was 9.9 days. Thirteen patients (37%) required temporary catheters for initial dialysis. This group included 16 patients (45.7%) with diabetes. CONCLUSION: Patients who participated in a multidisciplinary predialysis education program had fewer complications, ER visits, and hospitalizations. They also had fewer temporary catheter placements, shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs associated with initial dialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207