The effect of parathyroid hormone and teriparatide on fracture healing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Daily subcutaneous injections of parathyroid hormone (PTH), and its synthetic peptide fragment, teriparatide (PTH 1-34, TPTD), have a net anabolic effect on bone and prevent osteoporotic fractures. TPTD is currently approved for this indication worldwide. Because of the anabolic effect, there is an interest in a role for TPTD (and, where available, human PTH 1-84) in improving bone healing after a fracture. PTH has been studied in animal fracture healing models and in a limited number of human trials. We have reviewed current literature regarding possible mechanisms and efficacy for PTH and TPTD to improve the healing process in the setting of various types of fractures. AREAS COVERED: Our review focuses first on the role of PTH in normal bone. We then discuss mechanisms of normal bone healing as well as delayed and impaired fracture healing. We summarize pertinent animal data and then review human studies utilizing PTH or TPTD for fracture healing. In particular, we examine unique situations including osteoporotic fractures, diabetes, stress fractures, delayed or poor healing and combination with bisphosphonate therapy. EXPERT OPINION: Available data indicate there is likely an important role for TPTD and PTH in promoting fracture healing in selected patients, but more clinical trial data are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".