Morphology of trophic eggs and ovarian dynamics in the subsocial bug <i>Adomerus triguttulus</i> (Heteroptera: Cydnidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the subsocial burrower bug, Adomerus triguttulus (Motschulsky, 1886), females produce trophic eggs, which are inviable and serve as a food supply for hatched nymphs, and add them onto egg masses during maternal care. Trophic eggs are expected to be less costly for females to produce and for offspring to consume than viable eggs. Such specialization may be reflected in the size, structure, and developmental process of the eggs. Inviable trophic eggs were smaller than viable eggs, and the intraclutch size variation of the former was larger than that of the latter. The viable eggs always had approximately five micropylar processes at a pole, whereas the trophic eggs mostly lacked them. Active oogenesis was maintained during the maternal egg care period; oocyte development continued after the deposition of viable eggs and declined close to the hatching time of the clutches. Mature chorionated eggs were consistently observed in ovaries. It is strongly suggested that at least some trophic eggs contained in clutches at hatching are those that have matured and been deposited during the maternal care of eggs. We discuss possible selective factors leading to the specialization of these unusual heteropteran trophic eggs and the ecological significance of their ovarian dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".