MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160377811 · doi:10.5589/m03-020

Characterization of hurricane eyes in RADARSAT-1 images with wavelet analysis

2003· article· en· W2160377811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarRemote sensingGeologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractStriking examples of RADARSAT-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images of hurricanes have been acquired over the past few years. The images show, with high resolution, the imprint of these storms on the ocean surface roughness, including structures associated with atmospheric processes such as boundary layer rolls, and details associated with the eye of the storm. In this paper, an image-processing procedure for quantitatively characterizing SAR images of hurricane eyes (HEs) is described. The procedure uses the edge detection properties of wavelets to estimate the scale and area of HEs. Procedures are also introduced to determine a reference ellipse, the location of the centre, and an elliptical index. All parameters are measured quantitatively and objectively. Provision of a universal characterization procedure for SAR images of HEs will promote the use of RADARSAT-1 SAR images for the study of hurricane morphology and dynamics.Des exemples saisissants d'images RADARSAT-1 d'ouragans ont été acquis au cours des dernières années. Ces images montrent, avec une grande résolution, les empreintes de ces tempêtes sur la rugosité de surface de l'océan, incluant des structures associées à des processus atmosphériques comme les rouleaux de couches limites et des détails associés à l'œil de l'ouragan. Dans cet article, on décrit une procédure de traitement d'image pour la caractérisation quantitative des yeux d'ouragans (HE) sur les images RSO. La procédure utilize les propriétés de détection de contours des ondelettes pour estimer l'échelle et l'étendue des HE. Des procédures sont aussi introduites pour déterminer une ellipse de référence, la localization du centre et un index elliptique. Tous les paramètres sont mesurés quantitativement et objectivement. La mise au point d'une procédure universelle de caractérisation des HE sur les images RSO favorisera l'utilization des images RSO de RADARSAT-1 dans le contexte de l'étude de la morphologie et de la dynamique des ouragans.[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it