Placental Chondroitin Sulfate A–Binding Malarial Isolates Evade Innate Phagocytic Clearance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pregnancy-associated malaria is characterized by the accumulation of parasitized erythrocytes (PEs) and monocytes in the placenta, and they are believed to directly contribute to adverse birth outcomes. Although most parasite isolates adhere to CD36, placental isolates express novel variant surface antigens (VSAs) and bind to chondroitin sulfate A (CSA). CSA-binding PEs are rarely observed outside of pregnancy, and most primigravid women lack immunity and must rely on innate immune mechanisms to clear these placental parasite variants. We hypothesized that differences in VSA expression and adhesive phenotype between pregnancy-associated (CSA-binding) and non-pregnancy-associated (CD36-binding) isolates may have direct implications for the failure of primigravid women to control the placental parasite burden through innate phagocytic pathways. We demonstrate here, both in vitro and in vivo, that there is a nonopsonic phagocytic defect for CSA-binding PEs. The ability of CSA-binding PEs to evade innate clearance pathways may contribute to the parasite accumulation and recruitment of monocytes that characterize placental malaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".