MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160401885 · doi:10.1086/504721

Placental Chondroitin Sulfate A–Binding Malarial Isolates Evade Innate Phagocytic Clearance

2006· article· en· W2160401885 on OpenAlexaff
Lena Serghides, Samir N. Patel, Kodjo Ayi, Kevin C. Kain

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate immune systemBiologyImmunologyPlacentaMalariaImmune systemImmunityAntigenic variationPregnancyPlasmodium falciparumAntigenCD36FetusReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy-associated malaria is characterized by the accumulation of parasitized erythrocytes (PEs) and monocytes in the placenta, and they are believed to directly contribute to adverse birth outcomes. Although most parasite isolates adhere to CD36, placental isolates express novel variant surface antigens (VSAs) and bind to chondroitin sulfate A (CSA). CSA-binding PEs are rarely observed outside of pregnancy, and most primigravid women lack immunity and must rely on innate immune mechanisms to clear these placental parasite variants. We hypothesized that differences in VSA expression and adhesive phenotype between pregnancy-associated (CSA-binding) and non-pregnancy-associated (CD36-binding) isolates may have direct implications for the failure of primigravid women to control the placental parasite burden through innate phagocytic pathways. We demonstrate here, both in vitro and in vivo, that there is a nonopsonic phagocytic defect for CSA-binding PEs. The ability of CSA-binding PEs to evade innate clearance pathways may contribute to the parasite accumulation and recruitment of monocytes that characterize placental malaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207