A 2-week, polysomnographic, safety study of sodium oxybate in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sodium oxybate (SXB) is approved for cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) affects ∼9-50% of narcoleptics. Effects of 2-week SXB administration on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), and sleep architecture were investigated in OSAS patients. METHODS: OSAS patients (n = 48) received 2-week SXB or placebo (PBO) treatment with polysomnography at baseline and day 14. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in mean AHI. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in SaO(2), and sleep architecture. RESULTS: Compared with PBO, SXB significantly increased reduction in mean AHI and obstructive apnea index with SXB (-0.8 ± 13.3 vs. -8.2 ± 10.0; p = 0.0327 and 3.54 ± 11.1 vs. -4.72 ± 7.7; p = 0.0054, respectively) and significantly increased change in slow wave sleep duration (5.2 ± 25.0 min vs. 29.4 ± 37.0 min; p = 0.0038). There were no differences between treatments in SaO2, central apneic events, or other measures. Adverse events, most commonly headache, were noted in nine of 27 (33%) and six of 23 (26%) patients receiving SXB and PBO, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term use of 4.5 g/night SXB did not generate respiratory depressant effects in OSAS patients as measured by AHI, obstructive apnea events, central apneas, and SaO2. Extended use of SXB in higher therapeutic doses in OSAS has not been studied, and merits caution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".