Anomalous Negative Group Velocity in Coupled Positive-Index/Negative-Index Guides Supporting Complex Modes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomalous negative group velocity (NGV; group velocity antiparallel to the power flow) is reported in a guided-wave structure supporting complex modes. This structure consists of a coupled-line system comprising a positive-index microstrip line edge coupled to a negative-index line. The NGV can be observed on the positive-index line under suitable excitation and termination conditions. What is remarkable about this structure is that the anomalous NGV neither requires any material losses nor any strong reflections on the observed line. This work verifies that absorption or reflection are not necessary conditions for observing NGV, rather NGV can be observed in specific lossless coupled-line structures as well. The general conditions for obtaining NGV in coupled positive-index/negative-index guides are analytically derived and corresponding NGV observations are experimentally reported at microwave frequencies. Specifically, we report the propagation of modulated pulses exhibiting a negative group delay as well as phase shifters maintaining a constant phase over a broad bandwidth. This opens up the possibility of utilizing such coupled-line guides for applications in pulse shaping, delay control, constant phase shifters (vs. frequency) and reducing beam squinting in series-fed antenna arrays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".