Reproductive trade-offs in the elapid snakes <i>Austrelaps superbus</i> and <i>Austrelaps ramsayi</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reproductive traits and the trade-offs among these traits were examined in two venomous terrestrial elapid snakes, the Australian lowland copperhead, Austrelaps superbus, and the Australian highland copperhead, Austrelaps ramsayi. Sampling was difficult, so gravid females had to be held in captivity for up to several months prior to parturition. Analyses showed that captivity affected the time of parturition and maternal body condition, but it had no apparent effect on offspring traits. The results were corroborated by conducting partial follicular ablations in gravid A. superbus with fully yolked follicles. While these females gave birth earlier than unmanipulated females, offspring size was highly correlated with follicular size at the time of ablation and fell within the size range observed in the other females. This suggests that offspring size is fixed by the time follicles are fully yolked. Among unmanipulated females, reproductive traits were similar in A. superbus and A. ramsayi, but relationships among the traits differed. In the A. superbus sample, the trade-off between litter size and offspring size only became apparent after partial correlations, presumably because spring foraging obscured this relationship. In the A. ramsayi sample, however, the trade-off between litter size and offspring size was very pronounced. At this locality, there was no evidence of spring foraging, and snakes had fully developed follicles before or soon after they emerged from hibernation. This reduces the temporal separation between the times when litter size and offspring size are fixed and may allow greater control over the distribution of resources to offspring as a function of litter size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".