Effects of Substituting Barley Grain with Corn on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics, Milk Yield, and Milk Composition of Holstein Cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of corn or barley, or the equal mixture of both, on digestion characteristics and dairy cow performance was evaluated in metabolic and production experiments. Three rumen-cannulated early-lactation cows were used in a 3 x 3 Latin square design experiment to study the effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics and whole-tract digestion of substituting barley grain with corn. Production responses were determined by the use of 27 early-lactation Holstein cows. Cows in the production study were fed the test diets for 12 wk after a 2-wk covariate period. Results from the metabolic study indicated the effects of grain source on ruminal and total-tract digestion to be minimal. Total ruminal volatile fatty acids and acetate concentrations decreased linearly, butyrate increased linearly, and pH and lactic acid concentration were not affected by increasing levels of corn. Apparent digestibility of DM and organic matter showed a quadratic response with increasing the corn level in the diet, with no dietary effect on neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and cellulose digestion. Ruminal fermentation characteristics suggest that substitution of barley grain with corn may alter the site of digestion and the end products of digestion that are absorbed by the animal. Multiparous cows failed to respond to treatment, whereas primiparous animals showed the greater response in milk yield and milk-component yield to diets that contained an equal mixture of corn and barley. These results probably reflect a more optimal synchronization of dietary protein and energy for dairy cows fed the 50:50 barley/corn diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".