MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160671044 · doi:10.1002/hyp.10215

A comparison of nutrient export at two agricultural catchments: insight into the effect of increasing urban land cover in southern Ontario

2014· article· en· W2160671044 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shanel M. Raney, M. Catherine Eimers

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffParticulatesHydrology (agriculture)NitrateSTREAMSNutrientPhosphorusStreamflowLand coverAgricultural landAgricultureLand useDrainage basinChemistryGeographyEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study compared concentrations and export of total phosphorus (TP; including dissolved and particulate forms) and nitrogen (N) between quickflow and delayed flow at two adjacent agricultural catchments (Jennings and McLarens Creeks), one of which is undergoing increased urbanization. Annual runoff, frequency of quickflow events in the growing season (GS), and chloride (Cl − ) concentrations and export were greater at the more urbanized Jennings Creek. There were only modest differences in TP and total dissolved P between the two catchments, with the largest difference occurring in the GS, when the urbanized Jennings Creek had higher TP concentrations and export. In contrast, the majority of N export was as dissolved inorganic nitrate‐N (NO 3 − –N), and NO 3 − –N concentrations and export were consistently greater at the more agricultural McLarens Creek. Particulate P was sensitive to increases in quickflow, with particulate P accounting for approximately 75% of TP export during GS events. In contrast, NO 3 − –N export was less influenced by hydrologic conditions than P and appears to be delivered to these streams primarily by subsurface flow, which resulted in greater NO 3 − –N export during delayed flow compared with events at both catchments. Overall, these results suggest that urban cover at Jennings Creek has impacted streamflow with more frequent quickflow events during the GS and substantially higher stream Cl − , although the influence of urban increases at the expense of agricultural land on P and N export was less clear. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207