The importance of virus‐associated host ICAM‐1 in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 dissemination depends on the cellular context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to define whether the nature of virion-bound host cell membrane proteins influenced the process of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) capture and transmission. We pulsed cells of monocytoid lineage (established and primary) and CD4-negative epithelial cells transiently expressing DC-SIGN or LFA-1 with isogenic HIV-1 particles either devoid or bearing host-derived ICAM-1 or ICAM-3 before incubation with an indicator cell line. To our surprise, the ICAM-1/LFA-1 association was a more efficient transmission factor than the combined gp120/DC-SIGN and ICAM-3/DC-SIGN interactions. The involvement of the association between virus-bound ICAM-1 and its natural ligand LFA-1 in virus binding and carriage was confirmed when using more physiological cellular targets, i.e., human lymphoid tissues cultured ex vivo. However, the contribution of virus-anchored host ICAM-1 to the process of retention and transmission of HIV-1 could not be confirmed when using primary human cells of macrophage/dendritic lineage as transmitter cells and autologous CD4+ T lymphocytes as targets. Altogether these data underscore the complexity of factors participating in virus-cell contact and efficient dissemination of HIV-1 to target cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".