Treatment of ischemic limbs by transplantation of G-CSF stimulated bone marrow cells in diabetic rabbits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulated bone marrow mononuclear cells in the treatment of diabetic lower limb ischemic disease in a rabbit model. METHODS: The diabetic model was produced by intravenous injection of 5% alloxan into New Zealand white rabbits. The lower limb ischemia model was created by femoral artery ligation in diabetic rabbits (n=50) 14 days after alloxan injection. Animals were then randomized into five groups (10 rabbits per group): group 1, transplanted with G-CSF immobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC); group 2, transplanted with G-CSF stimulated bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC); group 3, animals were transplanted with non-stimulated BMMNCs; group 4, G-CSF group injected with G-CSF alone without transplantation; and group 5, PBS group treated with PBS alone. Necrosis of foot or toes and blood flow recovery in ischemic limbs was assessed. Expression of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) were measured in ischemic muscles by immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS: Blood flow in ischemic limbs was significantly improved in the G-BMMNC group (ratio of blood flows: 0.82+/-0.06) in comparison with the G-PBMNC (0.61+/-0.09) and BMMNC (0.62+/-0.08) groups (P < 0.001). In the G-BMMNC group, the capillary density, a measure of vWF expression, was significantly higher than in either the G-PBMNC or BMMNC groups (47.9+/-2.51 vs. 36.8+/-4.16 and 39.6+/-2.72, respectively, P < 0.05). The expression of VEGF in G-BMMNC animals was significantly increased in comparison with the G-PBMNC and BMMNC groups (16.93+/-0.70 vs. 11.83+/-0.98 and 12.32+/-0.96, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A combination of G-CSF stimulation and autologous transplantation of bone marrow stem cells synergistically improved neovascularization and angiogenesis in ischemic limb tissues in diabetic rabbits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".