MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160861153 · doi:10.4141/s05-034

Determination of exchangeable hydrogen ions in boreal shield soils of Quebec

2006· article· en· W2160861153 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nicolas Bélanger, J. Douglas MacDonald, David Paré, Évelyne Thiffault, Yves Claveau, William H. Hendershot

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityBureau de Coopération InteruniversitaireUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité LavalNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterChemistryCation-exchange capacityBorealSoil pHEnvironmental chemistryPodzolTaigaSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unbuffered BaCl2 extraction for determining effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC) and exchangeable cations is often used for acidic forest soils. However, the contribution of exchangeable H+ to ECEC cannot be assessed using this method as H+ in the extract may be produced/consumed in reactions with free Al3+ and Al-OH complexes, or H+ may be added to the extract via non-exchangeable sources. Fundamentally, any valid measure of ECEC must include some estimate of exchangeable H+ concentration or a demonstration that it is negligible. Unfortunately, this procedure is often neglected in forest soil studies. In this paper, we assessed the significance of the contribution of exchangeable H+ to ECEC for upper soil horizons of three sites of Quebec’s Boreal Shield subject to various disturbance types (i.e., recent harvest, fire and mature forest). We also investigated whether the linear relationships between exchangeable H+ concentrations and soil pH are robust enough to develop regression models capable of predicting exchangeable H+. Exchangeable H+ in the FH samples was higher than that in the podzolic B samples, but the amount of adsorbed H+ relative to ECEC was nevertheless significant in the podzolic B horizons. The general linear relationship (i.e., FH and podzolic B samples as a single data set) developed from soil pH in water explained close to 70% of the variability of log (H+/ECEC). The relationships between log (exchangeable H+) and pH in water in the FH samples were however superior (R2 ≥ 80), either for all sites, disturbance types and sampling strategies (e.g., proportions of F and H horizons in sample). The relationships developed for podzolic B samples alone were not as strong, but ECEC was used efficiently in combination with soil pH to increase prediction capabili ties (R2 ≥ 0.61). Key words: Boreal Shield forest soils, effective cation exchange capacity, exchangeable H+, fire, FH and podzolic B horizons, harvesting, prediction models, soil pH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207