Estimation of the whole‐plant CO<sub>2</sub>compensation point of tobacco (<i>Nicotiana tabacum</i>L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The whole‐plant CO 2 compensation point (Γ plant ) is the minimum atmospheric CO 2 level required for sustained growth. The minimum CO 2 requirement for growth is critical to understanding biosphere feedbacks on the carbon cycle during low CO 2 episodes; however, actual values of Γ plant remain difficult to calculate. Here, we have estimated Γ plant in tobacco by measuring the relative leaf expansion rate at several low levels of atmospheric CO 2 , and then extrapolating the leaf growth vs. CO 2 response to estimate CO 2 levels where no growth occurs. Plants were grown under three temperature treatments, 19/15, 25/20 and 30/25°C day/night, and at CO 2 levels of 100, 150, 190 and 270 μmol CO 2 mol −1 air. Biomass declined with growth CO 2 such that Γ plant was estimated to be approximately 65 μmol mol −1 for plants grown at 19/15 and 30/25°C. In the first 19 days after germination, plants grown at 100 μmol mol −1 had low growth rates, such that most remained as tiny seedlings (canopy size <1 cm 2 ). Most seedlings grown at 150 μmol mol −1 and 30/25°C also failed to grow beyond the small seedling size by day 19. Plants in all other treatments grew beyond the small seedling size within 3 weeks of planting. Given sufficient time (16 weeks after planting) plants at 100 μmol mol −1 eventually reached a robust size and produced an abundance of viable seed. Photosynthetic acclimation did not increase Rubisco content at low CO 2 . Instead, Rubisco levels were unchanged except at the 100 and 150 μmol mol −1 where they declined. Chlorophyll content and leaf weight per area declined in the same proportion as Rubisco, indicating that leaves became less expensive to produce. From these results, we conclude that the effects of very low CO 2 are most severe during seedling establishment, in large part because CO 2 deficiency slows the emergence and expansion of new leaves. Once sufficient leaf area is produced, plants enter the exponential growth phase and acquire sufficient carbon to complete their life cycle, even under warm conditions (30/25°C) and CO 2 levels as low as 100 μmol mol −1 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".