MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160960055 · doi:10.1504/ijahuc.2008.017003

A multi-gateway-based architecture for integrating ad hoc networks with the internet using multiple Foreign Agents

2008· article· en· W2160960055 on OpenAlexafffund
Mieso K. Denko, Chen Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkMobile ad hoc networkAd hoc On-Demand Distance Vector RoutingThe InternetWireless ad hoc networkVehicular ad hoc networkDistributed computingOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolRouting protocolWirelessRouting (electronic design automation)TelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are typically considered to be stand-alone autonomous networks that support multi-hop communication without relying on an existing infrastructure. The integration of MANETs and the internet extends network coverage and facilitates hybrid wired and wireless networking. Most earlier approaches, for integrating MANETs with the internet considered fixed gateways and registration by means of a single gateway or Foreign Agent (FA) with unidirectional connectivity. In this paper, we propose an architecture for integrating MANETs and the internet using multiple Mobile Gateways (MGs) and FAs. MGs move within a one-hop or two-hop distance from the FAs. We extended the Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol and Mobile IP (MIP) to achieve the integration. The simulation results show that the use of multiple MGs and a hybrid gate discovery mechanism enhances network performance while providing bi-directional internet connectivity in a multiple foreign agent environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous ComputingSame topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207