Live Nonpathogenic Parasitic Vector as a Candidate Vaccine against Visceral Leishmaniasis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To date, there are no proven vaccines against any form of leishmaniasis. The development of live attenuated vectors shows promise in the field of Leishmania vaccination because these organisms mimic more effectively the course of real infections and can elicit potent activation of the immune system. In the present study, we investigated the potential of a parasitic protozoan that is nonpathogenic to humans, Leishmania tarentolae, as a live candidate vaccine that efficiently targets dendritic cells and lymphoid organs, thus enhancing antigen presentation and consequently influencing the magnitude and quality of T-cell immune responses. We demonstrated that L. tarentolae activates the dendritic cell maturation process and induces T-cell proliferation and the production of gamma interferon, thus skewing CD4(+) T cells toward a Th1 cell phenotype. More importantly, we found that a single intraperitoneal injection of L. tarentolae could elicit a protective immune response against infectious challenge with Leishmania donovani in susceptible BALB/c mice. These results suggest that the use of L. tarentolae as a live vaccine vector may represent a promising approach for improving the effectiveness and safety of candidate live vaccines against Leishmania infections and possibly other intracellular pathogens for which T-cell mediated responses are critical for the development of protective immunity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it