Defining Regulatory Regions in the Rat Prolactin Gene Family Locus Using a Large P1 Genomic Clone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of the large rat prolactin gene family located on chromosome 17 are expressed in one or more placental trophoblast cell types and maternal decidua at specific times during pregnancy. Studies to identify the factors involved in these highly specific developmental expression patterns, using limited amounts of 5'-flanking DNA, have met with only partial success. Here we report the isolation and characterization of an 80-kb rat genomic clone, P1 12830, containing linked rat placental lactogen II, rat prolactin-like protein-I, and rat prolactin-like protein-B genes with substantial amounts of 5'- and 3'-flanking DNA as well as a rat placental lactogen II-related pseudogene, the first to be described in this gene family. This clone was used to create F0 transgenic mice, and the levels of expression of the three rat genes were compared with those of the endogenous mouse genes, using RT-PCR. Each rat gene was expressed differently in the same placenta, confirming the importance of sufficient flanking sequences in the expression of the individual genes. These studies emphasize the need for large genomic clones in defining the complete complement of factors that regulate the developmental expression of the rat prolactin gene locus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".