MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A large-scale CO survey of the Rosette Molecular Cloud: assessing the effects of O stars on surrounding molecular gas

2009· article· en· W2161294689 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. F. Dent, Gary Hovey, P. E. Dewdney, T. Burgess, A. Willis, J. F. Lightfoot, Tim Jenness, J. Leech, H. E. Matthews, M. H. Heyer, C. J. Poulton

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsNebulaStarsMolecular cloudAccelerationOrion NebulaVelocity gradientPower lawStar formationAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new large-scale survey of the J= 3–2 12CO emission covering 4.8 deg2 around the Rosette Nebula. The results reveal the complex dynamics of the molecular gas in this region. We identify about 2000 compact gas clumps having a mass distribution given by dN/dM∼M−1.8, with no dependence of the power-law index on distance from the central O stars. A detailed study of a number of the clumps in the inner region shows that most exhibit velocity gradients in the range 1–3 km s−1 pc−1, generally directed away from the exciting nebula. The magnitude of the velocity gradient decreases with distance from the central O stars, and we compare the apparent clump acceleration with a photoionized gas acceleration model. For most clumps outside the central nebula, the model predicts lifetimes of a few 105 yr. In one of the most extended of these clumps, however, a near-constant velocity gradient can be measured over 1.7 pc, which is difficult to explain with radiatively driven models of clump acceleration. As well as the individual accelerated clumps, an unresolved limb-brightened rim lies at the interface between the central nebular cavity and the Rosette Molecular Cloud. Extending over 4 pc along the edge of the nebula, this region is thought to be at an earlier phase of disruption than the accelerating compact globules. Blueshifted gas clumps around the nebula are in all cases associated with dark absorbing optical globules, indicating that this material lies in front of the nebula and has been accelerated towards us. Redshifted gas shows little evidence of associated line-of-sight dark clouds, indicating that the dominant bulk molecular gas motion throughout the region is expansion away from the O stars. In addition, we find evidence that many of the clumps lie in a molecular ring, having an expansion velocity of 30 km s−1 and radius 11 pc. The dynamical time-scale derived for this structure (∼106 yr) is similar to the age of the nebula as a whole (2 × 106 yr). The J= 3–2/1–0 12CO line ratio in the clumps decreases with radial distance from the exciting O stars, from 1.6 at ∼8 pc distance to 0.8 at 20 pc. This can be explained by a gradient in the surface temperature of the clumps with distance, and we compare the results with a simple model of surface heating by the central luminous stars. We identify seven high-velocity molecular flows in the region, with a close correspondence between these flows and embedded young clusters or known young luminous stars. These flows are sufficiently energetic to drive gas turbulence within each cluster, but fall short of the turbulent energy of the Rosette giant molecular cloud by two orders of magnitude. We find 14 clear examples of association between an embedded young star (as seen by Spitzer at 24 μm) and a CO clump in the molecular cloud facing the nebular. The CO morphology indicates that these are photoevaporating circumstellar envelopes. CO clumps without evidence of embedded stars tend to have lower gas velocity gradients. It is suggested that the presence of the young star may extend the lifespan of the externally photoevaporating envelope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207