A Controlled Study of Alexithymia in Adolescent Patients with Persistent Somatoform Pain Disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the differences in levels of alexithymia, depression, and anxiety between a sample of adolescents diagnosed with ICD-10 persistent somatoform pain disorder (defined by the DSM-IV as a pain disorder associated with psychological factors) and healthy adolescent control subjects. METHOD: Using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, we investigated the point prevalence of alexithymia, anxiety, and depression among adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, with somatoform disorder, who were hospitalized in Kaunas Medical University Hospital, Lithuania (n =120), and a healthy control group (n = 60) of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, who were randomly selected from 6 schools in Kaunas, Lithuania. RESULTS: The rate of alexithymia in adolescents with somatoform disorder was 59%, which was significantly higher than that in healthy control subjects (1%, P < 0.001). Similarly, the rate of anxiety was significantly higher in the patient group (62%), compared with control subjects (15%, P < 0.001). The rate of depression was low in both groups and did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with somatoform disorder have higher levels of alexithymia and anxiety than healthy adolescent control subjects, but adolescents with somatoform disorder and adolescent control subjects do not have significantly different levels of depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".