MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161395371 · doi:10.1139/g03-130

Genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms in barley by tetra-primer ARMS–PCR

2004· article· en· W2161395371 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elena Chiapparino, D Lee, P. Donini

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypingSNP genotypingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyMolecular Inversion ProbeGeneticsPrimer (cosmetics)GenotypeGermplasmPopulationPolymerase chain reactionSNPComputational biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most abundant form of DNA polymorphism. These polymorphisms can be used in plants as simple genetic markers for many breeding applications, for population studies, and for germplasm fingerprinting. The great increase in the available DNA sequences in the databases has made it possible to identify SNPs by "database mining", and the single most important factor preventing their widespread use appears to be the genotyping cost. Many genotyping platforms rely on the use of sophisticated, automated equipment coupled to costly chemistry and detection systems. A simple and economical method involving a single PCR is reported here for barley SNP genotyping. Using the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR procedure, we have been able to assay unambiguously five SNPs in a set of 132 varieties of cultivated barley. The results show the reliability of this technique and its potential for use in low- to moderate-throughput situations; the association of agronomically important traits is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207