MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161405350 · doi:10.1177/1074248410367792

Clinical Pharmacology of Dronedarone: Implications for the Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation

2010· article· en· W2161405350 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Dorian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDronedaroneMedicineCYP3A4AmiodaronePharmacologyAtrial fibrillationRenal functionDigoxinPharmacokineticsInternal medicineBioavailabilityCardiologyHeart failureCytochrome P450Metabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dronedarone, a recently approved antiarrhythmic agent, is a chemical analog of amiodarone. It has an approximately 15% bioavailability, with plasma concentrations markedly increasing after a high-fat meal; it is recommended to be taken with food. The primary metabolic clearance pathway for dronedarone is via the hepatic enzyme system (primarily cytochrome P450 3A4 [CYP3A4]); the half-life of dronedarone is 27 to 31 hours. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, are associated with a marked increase in dronedarone maximum concentration and are thus contraindicated; inducers of CYP3A4 will conversely decrease dronedarone exposure. Dronedarone is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and will lead to an increase in concentration of P-gp substrates such as digoxin. Dronedarone will cause a small increase in creatinine concentrations, without a change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Gender, renal dysfunction, weight, and age have little effect on the pharmacokinetics of dronedarone, and dose adjustment for these variables is not required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207