MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Hospital Amalgamation on the Job Attitudes of Nurses

2001· article· en· W2161406629 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marjorie Armstrong‐Stassen, Sheila Cameron, Janet Mantler, Martha E. Horsburgh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanCarleton UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob satisfactionPsychologyNursingSocial psychologyHumanitiesMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this longitudinal panel study we examined nurses' reactions to hospital amalgamation in both the hospitals being acquired and the acquiring hospitals. Data were collected in 1992, two years prior to the amalgamation announcement; in 1995, in the initial phase of the hospital amalgamation; and in 1997, during the amalgamation implementation. Compared with the pre‐amalgamation period, nurses in both the acquiring and the acquired hospitals reported a significant decrease in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational trust, and a significant increase in turnover intentions. Except for organizational commitment, nurses in the acquiring hospitals reported a greater deterioration in job attitudes indicating that they were more adversely affected by the amalgamation than nurses in the hospitals being acquired. Perceived organizational support and, to a lesser extent, immediate supervisor support played an instrumental role in promoting successful adjustment to the amalgamation. There was only limited evidence that perceived job insecurity and control‐oriented coping mediated the relationship between the support variables and job attitudes. Résumé Dans cette étude de panel, nous examinons les réactions des infirmières aux fusions des hôpitaux, à la fois dans les établissements acquéreurs et acquis. Les données ont été recueillies en 1992, deux ans avant l'annonce des fusions; ensuite en 1995, lors de leur annonce; et enfin en 1997, pendant leur mise en oeuvre. Les infirmières, tant dans les hôpitaux acquéreurs que dans les hôpitaux acquis, ont éprouvé une baisse considérable de leur satisfaction professionnelle, de leur engagement envers leur employeurs, et de leur confiance en leurs gestionnaires, de même qu'un désir accru d'abandon du métier ou de l'insitutiton en question. En particulier, la détérioration des attitudes a été plus marquée dans les hôpitaux acquéreurs, ce qui indique que ces infirmières se sont senties davantage mises à l'épreuve que celles dans les hôpitaux acquis. Cependant, l'adaptation à la fusion a été minimisée lorsque le soutien de l'établissement était bien perçu et, à un moindre degré, lors d'une constatation de soutien réel provenant de leurs supérieurs immédiats. Nous n'avons pas trouvé de preuve concluante que la perception de l'insécurité dans le travail, et les stratégies pour garder celle‐ci sous contrôle, aient influencé le rapport entre les paramètres du soutien et les attitudes envers le travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l AdministrationSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207