Governance and Competitiveness in the Birmingham Jewellery District
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drawing on the existing debate on the link between the governance of local production systems (i.e. clusters or industrial districts) and the development of localities, this paper analyses the structure of interfirm networking and co-operation, as well as the structure of governance, in the jewellery district in the Birmingham Jewellery Quarter (BJQ). The BJQ was an historical urban Marshallian industrial district at the turn of the 20th century; even today, in a small web of streets, there are still a large number of jewellery firms and allied jewellery trades. In fact, the BJQ is still a remarkable example of a localised industry with a pool of highly skilled labour, an extensive external division of labour across specialised firms and a fabric of social relationships. Since World War II, technological shocks and the emergence of tougher competition have damaged the organisation of production of the district, as well as impacting on its ability to be innovative and competitive in domestic and foreign markets. The sustainability of the jewellery district in the BJQ is one of the main targets of local policy-makers and agencies. However, as it is in the process of reinventing itself from a stagnant manufacturing industrial district into an urban creative district, its very existence is threatened by the transformation of parts of the area into a popular place in which to live, eat and drink. In this context, the participation of jewellery firms in the processes of decision-making is of paramount importance to ensure that the interests and needs of all stakeholders are voiced and taken on board.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".