WSN16-1: A Weighted Clustering Algorithm Using Local Cluster-heads Election for QoS in MANETs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new distributed weighted clustering algorithm with local cluster-heads election (WCA-L) based on an on-demand distributed clustering algorithm for multi-hop packet radio networks. The multi-hop packet radio networks, also named mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) have a dynamic topology due to the mobility of their nodes. This mobility makes the challenge harder for routing protocol. Moreover, the well known routing protocols are not able to offer QoS that is why we need to manage MANETs. Such task can be done using clustering techniques but the association and dissociation of nodes to and from clusters perturb the stability of the network topology, and hence reconfiguration of the system is often unavoidable. However, it is vital to keep the topology stable as long as possible. The nodes called cluster-heads form a dominant set and determine the topology and its stability. Simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate the stability of the dominant set in terms of updates of the dominant set, handovers of a node between two clusters and the QoS in terms of packet delivery rate and overhead provided by both our algorithm (WCA-L) and the weighted clustering algorithm (WCA), which does not consider prediction and local election. Results show that our algorithm performs better than WCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it