Perioperative Management in a Child with Familial Bilateral Pheochromocytoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Diagnosis and perioperative management of bilateral adrenal pheochromocytoma with a successful outcome is an apt combination of clinical knowledge and anaesthetic skills. Detailed history, meticulous physical examination, relevant laboratory investigations along with good preoperative pharmacological optimization and fluid resuscitation plays an important role in the perioperative period. Genetic testing and counseling should be offered to all the family members of patients suspected of familial predisposition. We report the anesthetic management of 10 year old male child with bilateral adrenal pheochromocytoma with family history of disease. Clinical Features: A10-year old male, presented to our pediatric outpatient clinic with gradually increasing holocranial headache, blurring of vision, sweating, photophobia, progressive quietness in nature and poor performance in school, increased thirst and urine output for one week along with pain over bilateral lower limbs and difficulty walking without support for 20days. Parents also reported two episodes of generalized convulsions with one episode of opisthotonic posturing and up rolling of eyes, which was sustained for 50 min. Family history of three sudden deaths, and father, a known case of pheochromocytoma along with clinical presentation, raised the suspicion of familial pheochromocytoma. Conclusion: Though pheochromocytomas are rare tumours, a high level of suspicion in paediatric age group, where patients don't present with classical symptoms, leads to early diagnosis and management and prevents catastrophic events. Young patients with bilateral disease and positive family history should be offered genetic testing. Preoperative catecholamine blockade and meticulous anaesthetic and surgical management are the keys to successful perioperative management of bilateral pheochromocytoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".